The author Munroe in thebook seems to speak of Adam as if Adam had no sence of loneliness, but I disagree (correct me if uninformed here) and feel that Adam was very perceptive per Gen3 in stating that once Adam named all the animals, he was "aware" that none of them were "like" him.
For "whatever" reason it seemed to be God's will for man to be perceptive and possibly seek out companionship?? It is noteworthy that God brought Eve to the presence of Adam, yet, it was Adam that percieved her compatibility to him
One fact is for certain, Adam knew that none of the animals were "like him". So if I had a dog, and a bird, and a cat, though I can interact with them on a certain level, I am perceptive enough to know that none are suitable to me, none can "help" me the way another like me can; bone of my bone (walking like me, moving like me) flesh of my flesh (sex, touch a woman), the lips for kissing, the eyes for looking, the hands for holding, the waist for bumbing, the cheeks for rubbing, the chest for caressing, the feet for tickling and though I am single, I know that none can satisfy me the way that another like me can
Comment 2:
You are right. Adam does Not say, "its not good for me to be alone." however Travis, do you think in the text, he looks observes and notices that none of the animals are "like" him? Possibly? there was something in Adam's trajectory that even caused God to glean that man "alone" was not good? and maybe male/female companionship was God's design, yet in still being 2 distinct individual creatures, different and different in relating to one another. Man alone was not good, yet now male and female is good, hence.."He who finds a wife, finds what is good and recieves favor of the Lord" and other, the woman is the glory of man, the woman was created for the man, male and female created he them, Prov a virtuous woman is a crown to her husband, but she that maketh ashamed is as rottenness in his bones,